GPOTD 05.28.14

Kerouac

weird musical dildo
pdivs7ckmiao23wbr22n.jpg

pf6lekz3bugff4buecfc.jpg

hjo6lxxq5dqwum5g2iup.jpg

uueznsgptr3evg5ht4fi.jpg

p35tff3pqustzys7aezj.jpg

hbrhvigug0xa7ze7h13o.jpg

f6u8nlnxgosy6lbwceni.jpg

lc65sicks8tr5xbjimko.jpg

nrwqxwod3mu2xvwvoevq.jpg


Guild Starfire III 1965

For sale is my 1965 Guild Starfire III made in Hoboken, NJ (serial number serial number is 407xx).

I acquired this guitar in a trade and, at the time, knew little about it other than the neck was comfortable and I like the sound of it. When I first attempted to figure out when the guitar was made using guild website, I discovered ambiguous information. Fortunately, I registered with a Guild forum (Let's Talk Guild) whose members were extremely knowledgeable on Guild guitars. Multiple members, including one who wrote a book on Guild guitars, confirmed that the guitar was made in 1965. You can view the forum thread here: http://www.letstalkguild.com/ltg/showthread.php?148221-My-Old-Starfire

In the end, I never bonded with the body shape and I have gas.

So, below is a list of the good and bad things about the guitar. To summarize: this is not a collector's piece. You might consider it a project guitar. It plays and sounds great but could use some work and replacement parts if you were interested in restoring it to a more historically accurate state. With some work, the guitar would likely sound and play even better too. Don't buy this guitar if you are looking for a pristine or perfect instrument. Only buy this guitar if you can embrace its imperfections or would like to spend the time and money restoring it.

The good:

  • the guitar sounds great
  • comfortable, easy playing neck (which is straight)
  • structurally solid
  • nice wood grain
  • the pickups are from the proper time period
  • the pickup switch looks to be from the proper time period
  • truss rod cover looks original
  • tuners are smooth and work great
The bad:
  • many non-original parts (i.e. tuners, bridge, bigsby style trem, wiring, knobs, and strap buttons) and the pickguard is missing
  • some fret wear on the first couple frets for the first few strings
  • the fret board shows some wear (though not uncomfortable or distracting while playing)
  • back of the neck has some finish imperfections (slight chips and small dents)
  • slight buckle rash on the back of the body
  • likely has been over-sprayed or refinished
  • the original bridge and pickguard holes have been filled
  • the top sheet on the headstock has some separation in the corners
  • some scratches and chips in the headstock top sheet
  • some vibrations when loudly strumming chords (playing acoustic); I do not hear them when playing plugged in
  • the bridge does not properly fit the bridge posts and lists towards the pickups; recommend replacing with a Schaller Roller Bridge (e.g. StewMac item # 1266)
  • some light scratches in the finish
  • some discoloration on the binding; there is a small spot on the back of the guitar where the binding slightly separated
  • the case is not snug
$999
 
I dig it. The bridge looks a little wonky but if it intonates properly and is stable, I'm ok with it.
 
Wow, frankly I expected the overall reaction to be just the opposite.

I like it.

Also, I believe the bridge is positioned that way to prevent the strings from binding on the saddles with use of the Bigsby; I could be wrong, though.
 
It seems a bit overpriced to me, due to the non-original parts. Maybe 600 or $700, but not $1000. Even then, it would have wow me.
 
Back
Top