Fender’s lawyers go to war!

I wonder if Guitar Law is a recognized specialty at law schools yet
  • Introduction to Guitar Jurisprudence
  • Torts and Telecasters
  • Constitutional Law: The Right to Rock
  • PRS: Property Rights & Singlecuts
  • The Law of Les Pauls and Precedent
  • Fender Litigation
  • Stratutory Interpretation
  • The Doctrine of Relic’ing
  • Evidence: Exhibit A Minor
  • Contract Law for Cover Bands
  • Advanced Tremolo Injunctions
  • Criminal Law: Unauthorized Stairway
  • Common Law vs. Locking Tremolo.
  • Vintage Instrument Valuations
  • The Law of Excessive Pedalboards
  • International Trade and Import Guitars
 
dozens of strat copies sold under the Harley Benton brand
Glenn Fricker may have to find another brand to influence, err talk up.

I was worried about YouTuber's revenue streams if this died down, so glad they can earn money again.
 
Last edited:
As I understand it, HB basically petitioned the court to clarify what the fuck is happening re: Fender, thereby setting the jurisdiction vs. directly suing Fender with some claim re: action or restitution.
 
Of all the incredibly cheap assed gear I've bought over the years, the only guitar that needed a straight up fret leveling, and not just a couple of frets sanded down a tad, was my Fender Player. Funny that it was my "splurge on a real guitar" guitar...

Still love that thing, glad I got my ideal Fender before they pulled this shit.
The initial Player series was crap. I prob tried a doz of em at GC hunting a decent working stiff Telecaster. Every single one was like they just hammered in the frets and said "box er up!", just total crap of a final finish and set up. Was gonna cost me either a hell of a lot of work or another couple hundred bucks to get the dang things playable. But then they upped their game quite a bit with the Player IIs to the point where I actually bought one, frets are much better dressed and the rolled fret edges improved things a bunch.
 
Back
Top