stop using roman numerals to represent chords

theres always Nashville Numbers:

Nashville number system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Nashville Number System is an informal method of transcribing music by denoting the scale degree on which a chord is built. It was developed by Neal Matthews, Jr. in the late '50s as a simplified system for The Jordanaires to use in the studio and further developed by Charlie McCoy. It resembles the Roman numeral and figured bass systems traditionally used to transcribe a chord progression. By writing chords as numbers, music may be transposed easily. As a simple system of transcription, it can be used with only a rudimentary background in music theory. Improvisation structures can be quickly explained using numbers and chord changes can be communicated mid-song by holding up the corresponding number of fingers. The system is flexible, and can be embellished to include more information (such as chord color or to denote a bass note in an inverted chord).


Nashville notation

Main article: Nashville number system


Nashville notation or Nashville number system[2] is a method of writing, or sketching out, musical ideas, using numbers in place of chord names. For example, in the key of C major, the chord D minor 7 can be written as "dm7", "2m7", or "ii7".


In the key of C, C=1, D=2, E=3, and so on for all seven notes in the key. So, the chord progression C///F///G///C/// would correspond to 1///4///5///1/// in Nashville notation, while G///C///D///G/// in the key of G would also become 1///4///5///1///.
This method of notation allows musicians who are familiar with basic music theory to play the same song in any key.
 
Maybe I just don't know enough about NNS, but it always seemed to me that it was nothing more than replacing the Roman numbering with our current number set. There doesn't seem to be any other "improvement."

Correct me if I'm wrong though. :shrug:
 
What's wrong with Roman Numerals?

You only have to know 8 of them, for Pete's sake......messedup0 (actually, only 2, "i" and "v", three if you count "x".)

Anybody with higher than a 5th grade education should have no problem deciphering them.....

just saying.
 
i-v-vi-iv

as all lower case roman number this is telling me that they are all minor chords.

A minor - E minor - F minor - G minor.

If this is really in the key of A minor it would have uppercase roman numerals for the major chords that naturally occur in that key:


i - A minor

ii dim - Bdim

III - C Major

iv - D minor

v - E Minor

VI - F major

VII - G major


Your progression would be i - v - VI - iv or A minor, E minor, F major - D minor

A common replacement for a minor key is to make the "v" chord major so that you get a better resolution to the "i" or tonic chord. Your progression in that case would be i - V - VI - iv or A minor, E major, F major - D minor

What is this for?
 
I really need to learn some theory. Perhaps I shouldn't have quit lessons after 1 :embarrassed:

Just a track I'm working on, haven't got an ear in mind for the chorus, and I remember someone mentioning the above progression (although I'm sure I've remembered it wrongly) :embarrassed:
 
I really need to learn some theory. Perhaps I shouldn't have quit lessons after 1 :embarrassed:

Just a track I'm working on, haven't got an ear in mind for the chorus, and I remember someone mentioning the above progression (although I'm sure I've remembered it wrongly) :embarrassed:

bookmarked :thu:

:thu:

once you get this stuff in your head it becomes a great way of thinking about things while you're writing (or learn someone elses song). One my wedding gig last night I had to transpose some songs on the fly while we were playing them and I would have been screwed without this.
 
C'mon, learn it. Then we can discuss how Sting subverts the doo-wop predictability of I-vi-IV-V by resolving to the vi instead of the I in "Every Breath You Take."
 
Back
Top